My debt to Yugoslavia

My Debt to Yugoslavia

I wrote this lengthy article about the war in Yugoslavia because the truth about it has not yet been revealed. The map on the left shows Yugoslavia between 1945 and 1991. It had six republics and two autonomous provinces.

If a person lives well in their homeland, they normally love it. So I loved Yugoslavia. Evil people attacked it. It hurt me a lot. I used every argument I could to defend Yugoslavia. Unfortunately, my words did not reach many people, so I couldn’t help. I have been a witness to the great injustice that the Western world imposed on Yugoslavia. I immediately realized that it could not have been a coincidence. Still, I did not know who was behind it, so I began researching the causes and responsibilities for the war in Yugoslavia. Here, I briefly summarize the most important observations, most of which are unknown to the public.

In 1990, aggression was committed against Yugoslavia. It lasted for ten years. In this essay, I will argue that the Rothschild family committed aggression. I wrote more about the Rothschild family in the article Has the Antichrist Come? The Rothschild family has amassed enormous economic power over the last two centuries, enough to influence the governments of Western countries. They are attempting to exert global control. And so the time came for Yugoslavia. I present the results of my investigation in the order they dawned on me. I wrote it with the idea of making tomorrow better.

***

People in Yugoslavia lived quite well before 1990. The standard of living was relatively high, and relations between people from the six republics and their respective nations and religions were usually harmonious. Most people belonged to the Slavic group and spoke Serbo-Croatian. The gap between rich and poor was small. Education was free. Health care was covered. One felt safe wherever they went, not only because of the strong police but also because people around them were generally peaceful.

Yugoslavia had a sound system, but it was still far from ideal. Yugoslavia was a socialist country with social ownership of the means of production, giving people economic security. But that security somewhat obscured freedom. Life in Yugoslavia was characterized by ideological and bureaucratic influences. The socialist system protected workers by privileging all workplaces. This led to irresponsibility in the production process, from workers to management, which systematically damaged the economy. People's irresponsibility was one reason Yugoslavia fell. The slower economy reduced workers’ purchasing power compared to more developed capitalist countries, where job responsibilities were more clearly defined. Although income was still higher than that of workers in less developed capitalist countries worldwide, it ultimately led to widespread dissatisfaction. At the federal level, representatives of the republics made all decisions by consensus, which was hard to reach. The whole country would suffer inconveniences if the decision could not be made.

This situation followed political pressures from the West, supported by economic blackmail, that destabilized Yugoslavia. Here, I quote an excerpt from the book “A Century of War: Anglo-American oil politics and the New World Order” by William F. Engdahl, which refers to the situation in Yugoslavia in these times:

Under the IMF policies, the Yugoslavian GDP sank in 1990 by 7.5 percent and by another 15 percent in 1991. Industrial production plunged 21 percent. The IMF demanded wholesale privatization of state enterprises. By 1990, more than 1,100 companies had gone bankrupt, and unemployment exceeded 20 percent. Economic pressure across the country created an explosive cocktail. Predictably, amid growing economic chaos, each region fought for its own survival against its neighbours. Leaving nothing to chance, the IMF ordered all wages frozen at 1989 levels, while inflation rose dramatically, reducing real earnings by 41 percent in the first six months of 1990. By 1991, inflation was over 140 percent. In this situation, the IMF ordered full convertibility of the dinar and the freeing of interest rates. The IMF explicitly prevented the Yugoslav government from borrowing from its own central bank, crippling the central government's ability to finance social and other programs. This freeze created a de facto economic secession, well before Croatia and Slovenia formally declared independence in June 1991.

The last Prime Minister of Yugoslavia, Ante Marković, attempted to rectify the situation in 1990 by acceding to the West’s demands and introducing capitalism. He said these changes naturally required free parliamentary elections, and he worked to implement them.

The dissatisfaction of the people and the liberal movement created under the pressure of the West became ideal for great manipulators, nationalists and criminals who, to win the support of their people, transferred the sources of the problem to Yugoslavia. At that time, I still did not know that the “new world order” gave financial and political support to the worst people in all the republics to initiate fights among the peoples and thus weaken Yugoslavia. They achieved the most tremendous success in Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, and Kosovo, which is why bloody wars took place there. With the help of corrupt leaders, the “new world order” intended to achieve Yugoslavia’s political and economic colonization. It was nothing but crime.

The economic irresponsibility of the people of Yugoslavia found its echo in political irresponsibility when, through the manipulation of the “new world order,” all republics except Serbia and Montenegro replaced their governments, electing leaders with intentions detrimental to Yugoslavia. The newly elected leaders demanded control over the republics’ resources and accused Yugoslavia of the inconveniences of living together. They immediately sabotaged Federal Prime Minister Ante Marković's program, which would undoubtedly have introduced Yugoslavia to the EU. Thus, the conflict between the republics arose, leading to the Yugoslav War.

Soon, the new leaders in Slovenia, Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, and Macedonia announced referendums on secession from Yugoslavia. Their results showed that most people from these republics wanted to secede from Yugoslavia. The Serbs did not want to secede because they lived in significant numbers in almost all of Yugoslavia's republics. The republics were created under President Tito's control, who divided the Serbs among the republics in a more disproportionate way than the other nations, since the Serbs were the largest ethnic group. In this way, the policy of world imperialists, known as the “New World Order,” led to the great irresponsibility of the people regarding their futures and successfully prepared the ground for their conquests.

The leaders of the separatist republics declared their independence from Yugoslavia. They invoked the constitutional rights of their republics, which stipulated that nations were entitled to self-determination and secession from Yugoslavia. The problem is that the constitution does not determine how to achieve withdrawal. The secessionists worried about the Yugoslav Constitution, which required consensus among representatives of all nations to adopt decisions about the country’s fate. According to the SFRY Constitution, republics could secede from Yugoslavia freely, but only after the republics' representatives had reached an agreement. Because this obligation did not suit secessionists, they concluded that Yugoslavia no longer needed to exist, as four of the six republics wanted secession. I believe that, at the time, most of Yugoslavia’s inhabitants would have supported the country’s survival. Still, the people of Yugoslavia were never asked about their fate.

World imperialists, through complete control over public information, misled the world about the reasons for the crisis in Yugoslavia, which was, of course, a form of support for secessionists and pressure on the authorities in Yugoslavia. Then, under the influence of world imperialists, countries around the world recognized the secession of the Yugoslav republics, even though it contradicted international law. The Helsinki Convention expressly forbids violent changes to borders in Europe.

Then, secessionists persistently worked on eliminating Yugoslavia. The United Nations supported this, and finally, Yugoslavia was removed from the UN. Yugoslavia had to ask for readmission to the UN. The world powers exercised their power by imposing unjust precedents on Yugoslavia. In any case, the demand for the abolition of Yugoslavia was an aggression against Yugoslavia. It also denied the Serbs the democratic right to remain in the country they wanted.

People from secessionist republics naively received strong support from the “New World Order” with sincere gratitude. The World’s imperialists masterfully realized the old, tested formula: “divide and conquer.” The secessionist countries were immersed in bloody civil wars, which set them back decades. If we exclude the privileged members of society, all these nations already live worse than they had lived in Yugoslavia, and the imperialist world benefits from it.

I was against the dissolution of Yugoslavia, but I would not have felt threatened or been severely against it if it had happened peacefully. The leaders of the republics who refused a peaceful agreement and instead sought to prolong the crisis in Yugoslavia were implicitly advocating for war. War brings out the worst kind of people who create the worst atrocities. These leaders had to know that, and that is why I consider them responsible for all the crimes that happened in Yugoslavia.

Slovenia

In the summer of 1991, the Slovenian government declared independence and cut all ties with Yugoslavia. It removed Yugoslavia's frontier symbols and announced that Yugoslavia no longer existed there. Because it had not reached an agreement on Slovenia’s secession at the Yugoslav level, this act was considered an aggression against Yugoslavia. The Yugoslav Federal Army had a constitutional obligation to protect the country’s territorial integrity; therefore, a few days later, the YFA sent tanks to secure the border crossing with Slovenia, Italy, Austria, and Hungary. The army expected the surprise and noise of powerful tank engines to do the job, so it sent tanks without ammunition. However, the Slovenian territorial defence forces were not surprised at all and responded by attacking the YFA with real ammunition.

Well-organized propaganda appeared throughout the world at that time, which accused the communist army of attacking Slovenia. The YFA soldiers were members of all Yugoslav nations, and incidentally, almost all critical positions in Yugoslavia were held by Croats. The army commander, Veljko Kadijević, was of mixed Croatian and Serbian descent. This unnecessary war lasted ten days. A few dozen soldiers were killed in the war. The YFA had almost ten times more casualties than the Slovenian forces because it did not have explicit orders to fight in Slovenia. After establishing peace, the entire YFA withdrew from Slovenia.

The question is: why didn't Slovenia request secession peacefully? No one would have opposed their request. I think that Milan Kučan, the President of Slovenia, gave some kind of answer to that. I listened to the news all day during that time. One morning, somewhere in the middle of the war, Kučan asked the YFA for a cease-fire. The next afternoon, he met in Austria with the German Foreign Minister, Hans Dietrich Genscher. After that, he said he no longer wanted to cease fire.

Croatia

Croatia’s situation was much more complicated because over 600,000 Serbs lived there, accounting for approximately 12% of the pre-war population. Besides Croats, Serbs in Croatia were the constitutive people of Croatia under the Constitution Law of the Republic of Croatia, and they did not want to secede from Yugoslavia.

For this reason, the newly elected Parliament of the Republic of Croatia decided by majority vote to take constitutional rights from the Serbs in Croatia and proclaim them as a minority. This could be called a democratic robbery of Serbs in the state of Croatia or a democratic crime. After that, the Serbs declared the part of Croatia where they had lived for centuries as a majority as the Republic of Srpska Krajina. The status of the new republic was undefined, but the idea was that if Croatia remained in Yugoslavia, Srpska Krajina would remain in Croatia. However, if Croatia separated from Yugoslavia, Srpska Krajina would separate from Croatia and join Yugoslavia.

Serbs still have memories of the Ustaše regime in the Independent State of Croatia (NDH) from World War II, which killed hundreds of thousands of Serbs. The new Croatian government tried to present Croatia to the world as a democratic country, but in practice, Croatia was a follower of the Independent State of Croatia, the racist genocide created by Hitler in World War II. Croatian President Franjo Tuđman publicly said that the NDH was the eternal aspiration of the Croatian people. At the pre-election rally in 1990, Franjo Tuđman said that he was proud that his wife was neither Serb nor Jew. The new Croatian government introduced a new monetary bill called ‘Kuna’, which previously existed only in the NDH during the Second World War. In the Croatian cities of Zagreb, Split, Zadar, and Slavonski Brod, a street is named after Mile Budak. He was a Croatian fascist ideologist in World War II who created a formula that stated that a third of the Serbs in Croatia should be killed, one-third expelled, and the last third converted to the Catholic religion. Serbs found it difficult to accept the new Croatian government, and they rebelled.

I lived in Croatia before the war started and witnessed the events there. The forces that lost World War II in Croatia were preparing to take revenge on Yugoslavia. Croats prepared for the war quietly before speaking openly in the media. The new Croatian government did not even attempt to find a compromise with the Croatian Serbs. Still, it acquired weapons in Hungary and attempted forcibly to recover the republic’s territorial integrity. After that, the Krajina Serbs received weapons from the territorial defence forces under the framework of the YFA and resisted the Croatian armed forces. Low-intensity struggles began, and the YFA maintained the lines of separation.

In Croatia, I worked as a fire protection inspector for the City of Zagreb’s Interior Affairs. One day, on the eve of the war, my colleague came back from a meeting with the senior police chief and transferred the message to our department, in which there were about 20 inspectors – quote: “If any of you are members of the Serbian Democratic Party, you will be shot in the head.” All the policemen in Croatia probably heard this message. I have never been a party member, but this was too much for me. I resigned and immediately left Croatia. While working as a police inspector in public companies, I often communicated with the company’s officers for national defence. I heard from them that the Croatian Government was preparing a massive mobilization for the war, in which I did not want to participate in any way. I was right. Soon after I left Croatia, I received a call for war mobilization. Many Serbs left Croatia as a result; so did many Croats. Then the Republic of Srpska Krajina prepared for war mobilization. Many Croats left Krajina because of it, and some Serbs as well.

Now, you might be thinking that my colleague’s statement about getting shot in the head was a stylistic figure, far from it. Not a few months passed since my refuge when a man appeared on Serbian television who claimed that the Deputy Minister of Internal Affairs of Croatia, Milan Brezak, hired him to kill the President of Srpska Krajina, Milan Babić. As evidence, they presented a recorded telephone conversation between them. The opposition in Serbia quickly declared the telephone conversation a forgery by President Slobodan Milošević. However, it was not a forgery. In fact, I recognized the voice of the telephone operator in the Republic’s Internal Affairs of Croatia.

The Croatian Government needed heavy weapons to reclaim its lost territory of Srpska Krajina, and the guns were already located in Croatia, stored in the YFA barracks. Therefore, it prepared an attack on the YFA barracks, accusing the YFA of aggression and the loss of its territory. The attack occurred on 25.08.1991. At that time, Croatian television proudly reported that on the first day of the war, 90% of the YFA objects fell to Croatia. That was true, but they were mostly abandoned buildings or facilities with few or no YFA soldiers. The YFA barracks were difficult to capture because they had heavy weapons and responded forcefully, despite the soldiers being mainly eighteen-year-olds. After that, the YFA had no choice but to free its army by attacking the Croatian armed forces. It began in September of 1991 and ended with the destruction of Vukovar and the siege of Dubrovnik. Well-organized world propaganda accused the Serbs of starting the war in Croatia.

The YFA had always been preparing for aggression from outside, and it was incapable and unprepared for what followed. One YFA soldier, dissatisfied with how the war in Vukovar was being led, took an armoured vehicle and drove to Belgrade, where he smashed several parked cars to draw attention to his revolt. Nothing happened to him. A few months later, one American soldier in the United States did the same thing during peacetime conditions and got shot in the head without warning. That is the way most developed democratic countries solve such problems. That is how they “protect” human rights; thus, there are no rebellions.

The new Croatian government made master imputations. For example, on October 7, 1991, an explosion in the courtyard of the “Banski Dvori” palace in Zagreb demolished it. At the time, Croatian President Franjo Tuđman, Yugoslav President Stjepan Mesić, and Yugoslav Prime Minister Ante Marković (all Croats) were in the palace. Croatian authorities have accused the Yugoslav Federal Army of the attempted assassination of the democratically elected Croatian leaders. The YFA denied any involvement. 

The Croatian government dragged out the investigation into the explosion in “Banski dvori.” Still, it did not provide the basic information about where the explosions occurred and the damage each caused, as if it had no interest in presenting the case. So, an independent observer cannot conclude whether the Croatian government planted the explosion to accuse the JNA or whether it was caused by a bomb or a rocket fired from a JNA plane. But President Tuđman knew when and where the explosion would occur.

Nobody was hurt inside the heavily damaged palace “Banski Dvori” despite being full of people, although a random passerby was killed. How is it possible? On that day, many senior employees of “Banski Dvori” did not come to work, which was very unusual, mainly because the President and Prime Minister of Yugoslavia had come from Belgrade as guests. Before the explosion, Franjo Tuđman and his guests stayed in the large reception room. The room had two doors. One was destroyed in the blast, and the other was intact, beside which they sat. Behind this door were two large safes in the next room. The Croatian TV immediately broadcast it after the explosion. The security staff member said the blast had moved the safes, which sounded illogical since the chairs hadn't been moved. I immediately noticed that the safes were placed there to prevent the explosion from hurting President Tuđman and his guests. However, the plan changed, and they left the room just before the explosion and went to the opposite part of the “Banski Dvori,” where they could not be harmed. In Croatia, this is presented as a miracle, but I am convinced everything was planned.

Who might have profited from the explosion? The next day, under "pressure from this act," Franjo Tuđman declared the independence of the Republic of Croatia. He also attracted many undecided Croats to his nationalist side and displayed the Yugoslav Federal Army as a gang of murderers. The Prime Minister of Yugoslavia, Ante Marković, returned to Belgrade to his alleged assassins the next day after the attack. It all says to me that the explosion in the Croatian President’s Palace in Zagreb was most likely the work of the President of Croatia, Franjo Tuđman. If the JFA carried out an airplane attack on the Banske Dvore, President Tuđman must have organized it with the help of an agent provocateur in the JFA, or he was helped by foreign secret services that had their agents in the JFA.

On December 7, 1991, five members of the special police unit of the Croatian Republic killed the Zec family, including a 14-year-old daughter, just because they were Serbs. They hadn’t even tried to hide their bodies; they just threw them in the dump. The murderers smoothly acknowledged all that they did to the Croatian Court, but were released due to irregular judicial procedures. The irregularity was that the accused's lawyer was not present during the interrogation. To me, the explanation was a transparent forgery. No one readily admits to killing unless it's part of a secret plan. That’s why I think that the court had no intention to punish the murderers at all. The case was meant to show the Serbs that Croatian law did not apply to them and that they should leave Croatia. After that, Croatian President Franjo Tuđman gave a medal for a heroic act in the war to Siniša Rimac, who was one of the killers of the Zec family.

In Croatia, such an ugly situation has been created for the Serbs that two of about twenty of my former colleagues who were Serbs and worked with me in the Inspectorate for Fire Protection in Zagreb committed suicide or were presented as having committed suicide.

During the war in Croatia, the EU and the UN offered help to stop the fighting. Many truces were established, but the so-called Cyrus Vance plan was accepted only when Croatia recognized that it could not win the YFA. Representatives of Yugoslavia, Croatia, Srpska Krajina and the UN signed the plan. Under this plan, the YFA withdrew from Croatia, and Srpska Krajina was disarmed and placed under the protection of UN military forces until the problem between the Serbs and Croats was resolved through negotiations.

When peace was established, the Vatican and Germany committed unnecessary aggression against Yugoslavia silently in January 1992 by supporting the violent secession and recognizing Slovenia and Croatia as independent states. Was it a form of revenge from World War II that led Germany to form the Independent State of Croatia? However, other countries have followed suit. Thus, Yugoslavia's borders were not changed peacefully through mutual negotiations, as required by international law (UN, Helsinki Convention) and the Constitution of the SFRY, but instead through forceful international recognition of an illegal secession.

Newly recognized Croatia accepted nothing less than the full reintegration of the Serb Krajina, which the Serbs refused. In 1995, the Croatian government mobilized its army to capture the territory of the Republic of Serbian Krajina, despite it being under UN protection. I don’t think that would have been possible without the support of more powerful states. At the time of the Croatian Army’s attack, named Operation “Storm,” NATO aircraft destroyed Serbian communications and radars “by mistake.” According to the Cyrus Vance Plan, Yugoslavia had an obligation to protect the Srpska Krajina if Croatia attacked it. Still, probably because of external pressure, it did not. Serbian Krajina had a vast desert territory and fewer people than the Croatian mobilized soldiers. The Serbian Krajina could not defend itself, so its inhabitants left.

The Croatian Helsinki Committee for Human Rights claims that during Operation Storm, 677 civilians were killed, mostly older people who did not want to leave their homes. The Veritas Documentation-Information Center lists 1,205 killed or missing Serbian civilians, among them 522 women and 12 children. Twenty thousand houses were destroyed or burned. President Tuđman's regime ruined the birthplace of the famous Serbian scientist Nikola Tesla in the village of Smiljan. His relatives in this village were already dead. They were killed by the Ustaše regime in August of 1941, together with 500 other Serbs from this village.

This picture has not been presented anywhere in global news media. Why? The international community, very concerned when the YFA started to crush the Croat armed rebellion, was indifferent when the Serbs suffered aggression. This was the most significant departure in Europe since the Second World War: approximately 200,000 Serbs, whose ancestors had lived in Croatia for centuries, left the Krajina region in 1995. This picture has not been presented anywhere in the global news media. Why? Today, 400,000 fewer Serbs live in Croatia than before the war. Two-thirds of Serbs left Croatia, accounting for approximately 8% of the Croatian population.

The Croats should have had the right to self-determination like any other nation. But after the crimes they committed against the Serbian people in WWII, they had to do it through negotiations with the Serbs. Instead, they expelled the Serbs from the Croatian constitution, threatened them, attacked them and exiled them from the Croatian state. Croatia is a criminal creation supported by the most powerful countries and the UN. How is it possible?

Bosnia and Herzegovina

Bosnia and Herzegovina had three constituent peoples: Muslims, who have been officially called Bosniaks since 1992, Serbs and Croats. In this respect, decisions related to the fate of Bosnia and Herzegovina should be made by consensus among representatives from all three nations. It was not suitable for Croats and Bosniaks, so they decided the fate of Bosnia-Herzegovina by a democratic majority. Bosnians wanted an independent Bosnia and Herzegovina, and the Croats saw secession from Yugoslavia as only the first step. The second step was supposed to be secession from Bosnia and Herzegovina to join Croatia, but that connection had not yet been made. Due to the complicated situation, the agreement at the Yugoslav level, where such problems under the Constitution of Yugoslavia had to be solved by consensus of the nations, was the only reasonable solution. However, the authorities in Bosnia and Herzegovina chose war.

The newly elected Bosnian government wanted to rule the whole of Bosnia and Herzegovina, but Serbs and Croats did not agree to that. Then, an informal division of Bosnia began along lines where each nation had a vast majority. However, small fights started in areas where the regions were mixed.

To prevent war in Bosnia and Herzegovina in March 1992, the EU proposed a solution to the crisis in Bosnia and Herzegovina through a so-called Cutileiro plan. Representatives of all the people of Bosnia and Herzegovina accepted the agreement and signed it in Lisbon, Portugal. This brought peace to Bosnia and Herzegovina. After that, the President of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Alija Izetbegović, spoke with the U.S. ambassador in Yugoslavia, Warren Zimmerman, and told him he was not satisfied with the plan. Ambassador Zimmerman then encouraged Izetbegović to withdraw his signature from the agreement, which he did. Immediately after that, the fighting in Bosnia and Herzegovina continued, but negotiations in Lisbon did not stop.

In April 1992, the U.S. and the EU recognized Bosnia and Herzegovina's independence. It appears that they did not prioritize establishing a peaceful solution there. It was irrelevant to them that the government of BH in Sarajevo did not control even the entire city of Sarajevo. It was not an essential fact to them that 1,500,000 Serbs, or one-third of the Bosnian Herzegovinian population, did not want to secede from Yugoslavia. It was not an essential fact to them that all sides of the conflict were armed. They knew their recognition would lead to war, and it did. That was the policy of evil intentions toward everyone living there. Why?

Until Bosnia and Herzegovina’s independence was recognized, the YFA was usually based in BH. However, it was treated as an aggressor on territory controlled by Bosniaks and Croats. In May of 1992, the YFA agreed with the Bosnian authorities to withdraw its troops from the barracks in Sarajevo and Tuzla, which were in the territory of Bosniaks’ control. On that occasion, the Bosnian army attacked the YFA vehicles and killed one hundred and one young soldiers and their elders. Television cameras recorded it all. Please click to see this video document:

But the Serbs in Bosnia were not obliged to rest. In war, there is no possibility to blame and punish individuals for the atrocities committed, so the crimes of individuals are blamed on their people. The Serbs owned a majority of the heavy weapons of the YFA that were located in Bosnia and Herzegovina because the Croatian and Bosnian soldiers and officers deserted from the YFA, leaving the heavy weapons to the Serbs. If the separation and division of Yugoslavia had been performed peacefully, the people would have shared all weapons. By possessing heavy weapons, the Serbs in Bosnia occupied the territory they considered belonged to them relatively quickly. That is the reason well-organized propaganda around the world declared the Serbs as aggressors.

The UN, led by the United States, accused Yugoslavia of the war in Bosnia-Herzegovina and Yugoslavia was called to stop; otherwise, it would face UN economic sanctions. While Yugoslavia did cooperate with the Bosnian Serbs at that time, it had no power to command them. Also, the Serbs in Bosnia did not have a significant interest in attacking them because they had mostly realized their war goals. Yugoslavia could not stop the Bosnian and Croatian army operations that were far more severe because they did not achieve their war goals. That is why the Bosnian government did not want to negotiate peace. The Bosnian authorities were those who did not allow anyone to leave Sarajevo. It was convenient for the Bosnian government to act like victims, but they did not suffer in any way. Bosniaks suffered greatly, just like the Croats and Serbs.

Shortly after the ultimatum, a massacre took place in Sarajevo on Vase Misina Street, where an explosion killed 17 people (Bosnians and Serbs) and wounded about a hundred. All Bosnian media, even today, unanimously accuse the Serbs of it. The Serbs have denied guilt the whole time, and even today, say that the Bosniaks caused the explosion so the Serbs would be accused. In their favour, the Bosnian television cameras arrived at the crime scene in under one minute. I want to ask the Bosnian authorities how that was possible. An independent investigation was never conducted. I think that the truth has to be found because otherwise, there would forever remain two versions of the massacre and the antagonism between the Serbs and Bosnians. If we judge it according to who made profits from that massacre, then the answer is the Bosnian government. After the EU and the U.S. recognized Bosnia and Herzegovina's independence, Bosniaks lost interest in the negotiations in Lisbon about the country’s future. The massacre in Sarajevo gave them an excuse to stop the talks. The Serbs were declared criminals all over the world, and the UN economic sanctions were imposed on Yugoslavia. After that, all the people in Bosnia and Herzegovina were tortured for three years because the national leaders did not give up on their demands.

News February 2, 2014, The ICTY Tribunal in The Hague: The grenades at Sarajevo Markale market (1994) were not fired by Serbs but by the Muslim Army of Bosnia and Herzegovina. A former Bosnian Muslim policeman who was a protected witness at the Hague Tribunal stated during his testimony in defence of Radovan Karadžić that the Army of Bosnia and Herzegovina fired the grenades at the Markale market in Sarajevo by order of then-leader Alija Izetbegović, in the Winter of 1994, which killed 66 and left 140 people injured.

***

Now, I will say a few words about the Serbian crimes. Local Serbs killed two hundred wounded Croatian soldiers captured in the Vukovar hospital after the fall of Vukovar.

It was revenge. The executors of the crime received lengthy prison sentences, but the mastermind was never found. To me, the command to kill looks like a fraud by foreign secret services. In any case, the local Serbs were to blame. The YFA did not respond, even though it was required to, because it oversaw the entire operation. Although the Yugoslav Army had strong moral training, morale declined in practice as Yugoslavia fell. Since the YFA did not react to it, the killing of prisoners spread to Bosnia and Herzegovina. This brought the greatest shame on the Serbian people. This originated with the massacre in Srebrenica.

Srebrenica is a town in eastern Bosnia where Bosniaks were predominantly located in the early 1990s. During the war in Bosnia and Herzegovina, the United Nations, led by the United States, declared the city a UN-protected zone. Srebrenica was supposed to be demilitarized, but it was not. Srebrenica thus became a safe place for Bosniaks who attacked neighbouring Serb villages, where, according to the Serbian Orthodox Church, they killed 3,287 Serbs from 1992 to 1995. The Serbs had to stop the killings, so they attacked and occupied Srebrenica on July 11, 1995. On that occasion, the Serbs allegedly killed 8,000 Muslim prisoners.

The massacre did occur, but Canadian General Lewis MacKenzie, the first commander of the UN protection force in Bosnia and Herzegovina, claims the number of Bosniaks killed was much lower. After several years of investigation, a list of over 2,000 murdered Bosniaks found in and around Srebrenica has been submitted to the International Court of Justice in The Hague. This number also includes casualties during the three years of intense fighting. The perpetrators of that crime were Serbs who took revenge for the death of friends and relatives killed by Bosniaks. A list of about 5,000 Bosniaks reported missing was also submitted to the court in The Hague. According to the Bosnian side, 6,066 victims of “genocide” were buried in the memorial center in Potočari near Srebrenica, while according to the Serbs, that number is exaggerated.

The International Court of Justice in The Hague has accused Serb leaders in Bosnia and Herzegovina, Radovan Karadžic and Ratko Mladić, of ordering the killing of captured Bosniaks. Analyzing the propaganda of the Western world, it is evident that this accusation was aimed at subduing the Serbs in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Strategically, such an order would be insane and counterproductive when the whole world was watching what the Serbs were doing in Bosnia. Logic says that Radovan Karadžić and Ratko Mladić had no interest in ordering such a crime. However, they are responsible because they led an army over which they did not have enough control.

Norwegian film directors Ola Flium and David Habdich investigated the Srebrenica massacre and made a documentary about it,

President Izetbegović could not have had any interest in inventing this, so it is reasonable to assume President Clinton said it. This statement is no surprise because the US administration was openly on the Bosniak side, trying to subdue the disobedient Serbs who resisted their domination. The only surprising fact is that President Clinton was very precise in naming the city of Srebrenica and the required number of Bosniaks killed. It sounds like it was part of an elaborate plan. It is also astonishing that this event happened two years later, precisely as President Clinton portrayed it. Therefore, we need to analyze how President Clinton could have foreseen this crime.

President Izetbegović's offer assumed that Bosnian military forces would withdraw from Srebrenica, which they did at President Alija Izetbegović's order. Thus, Bosniaks remained unprotected so that Serb troops could kill them. This is precisely what happened, although different versions of the event exist. But how could President Clinton know in advance that Serbian forces would commit such a crime? Serbs have never done anything like this in their entire history. President Clinton could only know that a massacre would happen if his people organized it. America had to have its agent in the Serb forces who organized the killings of Bosniaks while Serbian Army General Ratko Mladić was in Belgrade.

Who could that agent be? General Momčilo Perišić was captured on March 14, 2002, during a secret meeting with US diplomat John David Neighbour at the Šarić Motel on the Ibar Highway in Serbia. According to the official report on the case, General Perišić handed Neighbour secret military documents showing the Serbian army’s involvement in the wars in Croatia and Bosnia and Herzegovina. Both were immediately arrested, but Neighbour was soon released because he had diplomatic immunity. On February 5, 2021, the High Court in Belgrade sentenced Momčilo Perišić, a former Chief of Staff of the Yugoslav Army and Deputy Prime Minister of Serbia, to three years in prison for disclosing state secrets to the United States in 2002.

But why would General Perišić betray his homeland? The International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia in The Hague, in one of the last indictments in February 2005, indicted General Perišić for murder, inhumane acts, persecution on political, racial or religious grounds, extermination, and attacks on civilians for failing to stop his subordinates from committing the siege of Sarajevo, the Zagreb rocket attack and the Srebrenica massacre. On September 6, 2011, the court in The Hague sentenced General Perišić to 27 years in prison for war crimes and crimes against humanity.

The accusations against General Perišić were known ten years earlier, when the Americans were already in conflict with Yugoslavia, so they needed a traitor in the Serbian army to provide them with the necessary information. Therefore, they could offer General Perišić a waiver of responsibility for the Hague charges in exchange for cooperation, and General Perišić could accept that. That could be the reason why, two years later, on February 28, 2013, the Appeals Chamber of the Hague Tribunal ruled that Momčilo Perišić was not responsible for war crimes committed by the Bosnian Serb Army in Sarajevo and Srebrenica because they were not under Yugoslav command. Thus, the Hague Tribunal annulled the previous sentence of 27 years in prison and acquitted Momčilo Perišić of all charges in the wars in Yugoslavia.

That precedent did not apply to other Serbian generals. That precedent may suggest that the United States utilized its influence in the International Court of Justice in The Hague to assist its agent. Now, when the Norwegian documentary “A Betrayed City” shows that Presidents Clinton and Izetbegović were able to organize the Srebrenica massacre, it is essential to investigate General Perišić’s possible involvement in the massacre.

General Momčilo Perišić might have become a traitor to the Serbs in Bosnia seven years before he was captured in Serbia. The Americans could not find a more suitable person in Bosnia and Herzegovina than General Perišić because he was the most influential Yugoslav general in the Serbian Republic and probably the only general who would have the power to impose the massacre of Bosniaks in Srebrenica. But, of course, General Perišić certainly did not do that voluntarily. Once a traitor to his homeland begins to cooperate with the Americans, he has no choice but to comply with their demands.

But even if General Perišić did not organize the murder of Bosniaks, someone had to organize a systematic killing of such magnitude. Serbs had no good reason to organize it. It could only be organized by a Serb traitor in Bosnia. It should still be assumed that the Americans have found a traitor among the Serbs because they benefited from it. Besides, it is the standard American procedure in all conflicts. It can be determined who ordered the killings because it is not difficult to follow the chain of command to the organizers. Some Serbs certainly know who did it, but they cover it in solidarity, believing they are resisting the enemy. If one starts from the assumption that America organized the murder of Bosniaks, the investigation will name a Serbian traitor, whoever it was. That would somewhat redeem the Serbian reputation in Bosnia.

The accusation against the Serbs gave NATO an excuse to start bombing the Serbs in Bosnia. A month later, the Croatian Army carried out an aggression called Storm on Srpska Krajina, which was also protected by the UN, and on that occasion, it killed 1,268 Serbs while 1,080 went missing, but NATO did not respond to it at all. Why does NATO have double standards? NATO did not stop bombing the Serbs in Bosnia and Herzegovina until the Serbs signed a peace agreement in Dayton. Thus, the war in Bosnia and Herzegovina came to an end. Under the Dayton Agreement, the Serbs received recognition of the Serbian Republic and 49% of Bosnia and Herzegovina's territory, which was approximately what they had been offered under the Cutiller plan they had accepted before the war began. So why, then, was the war waged?

Serbia

The U.N. economic sanctions imposed on Yugoslavia because of the war in Bosnia and Herzegovina closed plants and led to the collapse of the Serbian and Montenegrin economies. Economic sanctions had a more substantial impact on the economy than war. Legal trade traffic across the Yugoslavian border was suspended entirely, and all business operations had to go through illicit channels. Yugoslavia started to depend on criminals. That is how world powers destroy disobedient states today. This whole time, Yugoslavia took care of about an average of 500,000 refugees who had been expelled or had run away from the secessionist republics.

Serbia and Montenegro remained under UN economic sanctions even after the peace agreement in Bosnia and Herzegovina was established in 1995. Why? The UN did not provide a definitive answer, but indications suggest the unresolved issue of Kosovo and Metohija remained. Serbs consider Kosovo and Metohija the cradle of their nation and their culture. Almost all Serbian medieval Monasteries are located there, while traces of old Albanian culture are absent. It says to the Serbs that they are the native people of Kosovo and Metohija and that it belongs to them.

Problems in Yugoslavia began in Kosovo and Metohija in the 1980s. According to the Constitution of Kosovo and Metohija, created under the control of Yugoslav President Josip Broz Tito in 1974, the province of Kosovo and Metohija has formally been part of Serbia. Still, it had the same rights in Yugoslavia as the Republic of Serbia, or sometimes even higher. Kosovo and Metohija made decisions independently, whereas Serbia had to reach consensus with its provinces on specific issues.

Kosovo and Metohija was a very underdeveloped province that received significant financial assistance from all of Yugoslavia. Nevertheless, the province's communist government failed to initiate economic development. As a result, Kosovo and Metohija became a bottomless pit, and its prosperity was nowhere to be seen. Such a situation was unsatisfactory to all of Yugoslavia, including the people of Kosovo and Metohija. This led to the development of nationalist movements in Kosovo and Metohija, which aimed for the province’s independence. At the time, the path to autonomy was based on the Albanians’ high birthrate. On the other hand, the Serbs had been leaving Kosovo and Metohija, either because they received a good redemption price for their properties from the Albanians or because they felt threatened in the province where Albanians, in the year 1990, had nearly 90% of the population.

Then, Slobodan Milošević entered the scene. Instead of developing Serbia’s economy and fostering good relations with the Albanians to resolve problems, he responded to Albanian nationalism with strong Serbian nationalism. He organized massive rallies in support of its policy. After that, Slobodan Milošević asked the Communist leadership of Kosovo and Metohija to return the constitutional functions to the Republic of Serbia that Tito had given them in 1974. Under intense pressure from the Serbian nationalist movement in 1989, the Parliament of Kosovo and Metohija returned it. It was a Pyrrhic victory for Slobodan Milošević, as the Albanians only intensified their separatist tendencies afterward. Also, strong nationalism in Serbia provoked nationalism in other republics of Yugoslavia. Thus, Slobodan Milošević increased the problems in Yugoslavia. I wouldn’t say that Slobodan Milošević had bad intentions toward anyone. He was unable to meet the challenges he faced. His opposition to the world’s imperialists, though he lacked sufficient support at home and abroad, proved a significant mistake.

Despite UN sanctions, Yugoslavia did not abandon its independent policy. It tried to reach an agreement with the Albanians in Kosovo and Metohija on a shared future. Still, after Yugoslavia's disintegration, the Albanians accepted nothing less than full independence, which Serbia could not allow. Then, somewhere in 1996, Albanians in Kosovo and Metohija began to get weapons, founded the Kosovo Liberation Army and started to kill the Serbian police. In 1998, the U.S. Government added the Kosovo Liberation Army to the list of terrorist organizations. However, former Canadian Ambassador to Yugoslavia James Bissett observed that “the American war against terrorism” was not affecting the KLA. Before the war in Kosovo, U.S. administration representative Richard Holbrook publicly met with the rebel leaders of the KLA in Kosovo, which at that time was on the U.S. list of terrorist organizations.

In early 1999, someone encouraged the inhabitants of the village of Račak, a strong base of supporters of the Kosovo Liberation Army, to attack the Yugoslav special police force. After the fierce battle, 45 Albanians were killed. These people were sacrificed because they did not have any chance against the highly equipped and skilled Yugoslav special police forces. This period is very well displayed in these documentaries:

However, attacking an independent country that did not attack another is an imperialist crime, according to the UN Charter. Therefore, NATO tried to justify the aggression against Yugoslavia on charges that the Yugoslav Army slaughtered up to 100,000 Albanians and expelled up to 700,000 Albanians from Kosovo. They could not present any evidence for these accusations because none of them was right.

The war ended with the adoption of UN Security Council Resolution 1244. Under it, the Yugoslav army withdrew from Kosovo, the UN took over the administration of Kosovo, NATO was supposed to protect the inhabitants of Kosovo, and the future status of Kosovo was to be determined through negotiations between the Serbs and Albanians, respecting the integrity of Yugoslavia. However, the agreement's final conditions were not met. NATO did not protect the remaining Serbs in Kosovo. A former Canadian ambassador to Yugoslavia, James Bissett, claims that after the departure of the Yugoslav army, around 2,000 Serbs were killed in Kosovo, and the rest fled. Please watch the documentary Kosovo – Can You Imagine by Boris Malagurski, which shows the fate of Serbs in Kosovo after the NATO aggression. The Western media has never announced the crimes against Serbs that were committed there. Why? The former war crimes prosecutor Carla Del Ponte stated in her book The Hunt: Me and War Criminals that Kosovar Albanian guerrillas transported 300 Serbian prisoners to Albania, where they were killed and their organs removed and trafficked. If NATO carried out the aggression against Yugoslavia because of the 45 killed Albanians in Kosovo, why did it not attack Kosovo and Metohija for the crimes that Albanians in Kosovo committed against Serbs? If we take all of this into consideration, is Kosovo not a criminal creation of the Western world? On top of it all, the United States and most EU member states recognized Kosovo’s independence, contrary to UN Security Council Resolution 1244.

Yugoslavia still has not been released from the UN economic sanctions. So what was the problem? The problem was that the President of Yugoslavia, Slobodan Milošević, who was portrayed as primarily responsible for all the evil in Yugoslavia, had to fall. World leaders removed Slobodan Milošević from power in 2000, when elections were held in Serbia. After about ten years of suffering which the Serbian people were exposed to, the Serbs became tired. They gave more votes to Vojislav Koštunica, the leader of the Democratic Party of Serbia, than to Slobodan Milosevic. However, Vojislav Koštunica did not receive more than 50% of the votes in the first round; therefore, a second round of voting should have been held. The opposition in Serbia declared that the election result was a fraud and was assisted by powers from outside the country, and they raised a violent revolution in Serbia. If the opposition had gone to a second round, Vojislav Koštunica would have won the democratic election legally and peacefully. Outside powers wanted blood in Serbia. It didn't happen because Slobodan Milošević didn't want it.

Slobodan Milošević was removed, then arrested and delivered to the International Court in The Hague on charges of violating the Constitution of Yugoslavia. Now, it should be noted that the International Court in The Hague is not a legal entity because the UN Security Council, not the UN General Assembly, established it. The International Court in The Hague was, in fact, created by the imperialist world to prevent any resistance to their hegemony. Thus, the criminal gets the legal right to condemn their victims.

Now, I must say that Slobodan Milošević was sometimes arrogant as President, which is not a wise characteristic for a politician, but he did not commit any crimes. Please see the documentary: “SHOCKING: Slobodan Milošević was INNOCENT!” on YouTube in 5 parts:

Finally, through the enormous intervention of the world powers, obedient people came to power in Yugoslavia. Thus, Yugoslavia ultimately capitulated. Only then did the peace come. Only then were the UN sanctions lifted from Yugoslavia. Ultimately, Yugoslavia consisted of only the Republics of Serbia and Montenegro. It was such an unsuccessful creation that it could not survive. In 2003, the Governments of Serbia and Montenegro abolished it entirely. That is how my homeland was removed from the world map.

The aggression of the Rothschild family

Everything I have written so far can be easily verified. So, why hasn’t anyone displayed it to the world? I set myself simple questions:

Who has the power to dictate what the world media will publish?

Who has the power to present an entire nation unfairly?

Who has the power to impose economic sanctions to one nation unjustly?

Who has the power to remove a founder of the UN from the UN membership?

Who has the power to kill people in an international institution of justice?

Who has the power to make national leaders commit crimes?

Who has the power to profit from all of this?

Thus, a range of intense powers, including the economy, military force, media, and politicians, which were used in the attack on Yugoslavia, suggests that there is a strong force that unites them. After much study, I realized that the Rothschild family and their partners govern the world. I presented my findings in the article Has Antichrist Come? My observations suggest a conspiracy theory; however, have I not provided enough evidence to support the existence of a conspiracy? Here is an enclosed YouTube video:

The Rothschild family is primarily a banking family that first established its global operations. They couldn't manage all their businesses, so they hired expert agents to run their companies in their names. To stimulate these agents to earn more money, they received small shares of the ownership and became partners. The Rothschilds have established the entire hierarchical structure of their partners throughout the 18th, 19th, and 20th centuries and continue to do so today. Some people refer to this structure as the Masons, and the top of the hierarchical structure is the Illuminati. The Rothschild family has learned that hiding their wealth behind their partners is a better strategy, allowing their power to grow while they remain invisible. For almost 300 years, the Rothschild family and their partners could have bought half the world, but no one knows it. Thus, the Rothschild family has amassed power greater than that of the largest empires in human history, and they rule the world imperceptibly. Because they are invisible, they cannot be held responsible for the evil they cause worldwide.

The agents of the Rothschild family do not spare money in establishing control over the media since the media forms public opinion, and after that, they can virtually do whatever they want. The Rothschild family cannot directly control state media, but it still influences it through governments it controls. This way, they have created propaganda in the whole world against Yugoslavia. One-sided coverage of the war in Yugoslavia around the globe is sufficient proof to me that there is an organization that controls world media. Based on the data I have collected, the Rothschild family, with their partners, must control the organization.

If the owners of the world’s largest corporations, such as Rockefeller, Morgan, Goldberg, Wartburg, Goldman, etc. (who also hide their power), were independent of the Rothschild family, then they would, according to the competitive nature of entrepreneurs in capitalism, be confronting each other, but they don’t. Some rivals of the Rothschild family would have publicly disclosed the truth about the war in Yugoslavia, but they did not. This suggests that old, wealthy families have formed partnerships to better control the world. The Rothschild family leads the association because it entered the world market in an organized manner, about a hundred years before the partners mentioned above. I would like to emphasize again that this story revolves around a conspiracy. The leader of the world conspiracy cannot be David, the head of the Rockefeller family, because he is very exposed. He publicly tells the Presidents of the United States what they should do. The conspiracy leader must be someone who does not appear in public, like the head of the Rothschild family. His name is Jacob, and he is most famous for his love of art.

Through its agents, the Rothschild family supports the election campaigns of influential politicians worldwide, ensuring that these politicians are beholden to them. Politicians do not have much choice. Anyone who does not follow policies that conform to the Rothschilds can be portrayed very critically in the media, which may quickly call their career into question. I recall a very reasonable U.S. president, Jimmy Carter, whom the media declared one of the least capable American presidents of all time, which ultimately ended his career. Slobodan Milošević was not sufficiently aware of his enemies’ power, so he resisted them strongly. That is why he ended up badly. People, please think a little bit about this; all the information you have received about Slobodan Milošević came from the people who attacked him. Isn’t this horrible? A former Canadian ambassador to Yugoslavia, James Bissett, claims that the charges against Slobodan Milosevic were pure fantasy. Worse still, James Bissett claims that George Soros funds the International Court in The Hague. That means the people who judged Slobodan Milosevic are the same people who attacked him.

Yugoslavia resisted the world powers for eight years, and finally, the world powers lost their patience. When they portrayed Yugoslavia badly enough in their media, the world powers demanded that world politicians do something “in the name of justice.” In the beginning, “justice” was mainly based on the accusation of Yugoslavia and the illegal recognition of the secessionist republic’s independence. The demand for imposing UN economic sanctions on Yugoslavia passed relatively quickly. After that, the leaders of the Western countries received a request for military aggression against Yugoslavia. However, Russia vetoed the request in the UN Security Council. Attacking an independent state without the United Nations' consent violated international law. Therefore, this request could not pass easily. Formally, US President Bill Clinton was supposed to launch the attack on Yugoslavia. Naturally, he resisted committing the crime. Then appeared the Monika Lewinsky case, where the media showed great interest in the sexual life of President Clinton, reporting on it every day for more than a year. Then, the American Congress, Senate, and Supreme Court found an interest in the sexual life of the president of the US and subpoenaed him to testify about his sex life before the Grand Jury. Since when have the US Congress, Senate, and Supreme Court been interested in the sexual life of the American president?

The answer is – from the moment Bill Clinton resisted committing the crime of aggression against Yugoslavia. President Clinton lied before the Grand Jury about his sex life, which is what most people would do in his place. And because he lied under oath about his sexual life, it led to charges of perjury, obstruction of justice and his impeachment. Bill Clinton’s sexual life might have removed him from the presidential position. Seriously?

Bill Clinton’s impeachment process was nothing more than blackmail. The blackmail forced President Clinton to lead the criminal NATO aggression against Yugoslavia or else face removal from his position. Of course, President Clinton preferred his job more than the lives of thousands of people and commanded the attack on Yugoslavia. The Lewinsky case was completely forgotten the moment that Bill Clinton decided to carry out military aggression against Yugoslavia. Now the question comes up: who has such power to manipulate the American Congress, Senate, and Supreme Court and to blackmail the president of the United States? It is undoubtedly a powerful organization with exceptionally wealthy people. This narrows the number of people who may commit such a crime to a few, and the investigation should not have trouble finding those responsible, even if they hide their wealth and influence.

It should be pointed out that not all members of NATO bombarded Yugoslavia. The aggression was committed by Belgium, Canada, the Czech Republic, Denmark, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, the Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Spain, Turkey, the United Kingdom, and the United States. The aggression refused Greece, the Island, and Luxembourg. Honour to them! All the presidents of states or governments who joined President Clinton in the aggression against Yugoslavia are also criminals. How might that be possible? Naturally, the Rothschild family has built conspiracies against humanity throughout the centuries, in which ignorance, lies, stupidity, immorality, fear, and corruption grow and then rule. Dear readers, you have received all the information about the war in Yugoslavia from the same people who started the aggression in the first place. Is this not a horrible fact?

The Rothschild family did not destroy Yugoslavia to give the Yugoslav people democratic rights. This, indeed, is not the case. It destroyed Yugoslavia to take control of the people of the former Yugoslavia easily. Through their agent, the “benefactor” for Eastern Europe, George Soros and his “open society,” the Rothschild family made donations to the opposition to the Communist Party, which was in power in Yugoslavia. This opposition was interested in destroying Yugoslavia, mainly itself, so that the donors did not need to interfere much in their affairs. But there was coordination. Perhaps you haven’t noticed, but the destruction waited in line, one after the other: Slovenia, Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Kosovo and Metohija.

However, maybe some higher justice exists! Have you noticed that the chief domestic destroyers of Yugoslavia, Janez Drnovšek, Franjo Tuđman, Gojko Šušak, Alija Izetbegović and Ibrahim Rugova died of cancer? Coincidence? Please check how many national leaders die of cancer in any country around the world, and maybe you will then become aware of what a coincidence it is. With this in mind, if my name were Janez Janša, Milan Kučan, Stjepan Mesić, Vladimir Šeks, Ejup Ganić, Haris Silajdžić, Hashim Thaçi, Ramush Haradinaj, or someone like them, I would check my health more often.

All the politicians mentioned shared a desire for their states to become EU members. However, the people in these states were far from united in their desire to join the EU. Why did these politicians fight so hard to leave one country and then rush to join another? It is even stranger that Yugoslavia and the EU have no significant organizational differences. But that is all irrelevant to them. The only relevant fact to them is being in the center of attention, as it gives them power. They know they can achieve this only by obeying the rules that higher powers preach. These people are interested just in naked power, and they realize it over the bodies of dead people.

The Rothschild family did not destroy Yugoslavia to leave the Yugoslav companies to the free market either. Their agents attacked Yugoslavia from the inside. Who are these agents? They are the newly established owners of companies in all the republics of the former Yugoslavia. They first gained control of the media by influencing public opinion. Now, whatever newspapers you read in the region of the former Yugoslavia are under the control of the Rothschild family or follow the Rothschild family’s policies because they do not know what else to do.

All new tycoons who made fortunes from nothing are agents or partners of the Rothschild family, even if they don't realize it, because they communicate only with the Rothschild family's lower agents. The tycoons have enormous amounts of money to invest in anything that promises a good business opportunity. They also prioritize buying companies with the help of local politicians they have corrupted. Even if these tycoons were successful businesspeople in socialist Yugoslavia, they were offered the recapitalization with a large sum of money and business connections that they could not refuse. Some petty thieves could enrich themselves by robbing public property, but big thieves could not survive long without the support of the Rothschild family. The Rothschild family, along with its partners, maintains control over all significant production routes, enabling it to quickly eliminate non-cooperative entrepreneurs from the market. Thus, the Rothschilds carried out the colonization of all the republics of the former Yugoslavia.

Briefly about the reasons for the violent breakup of Yugoslavia

Yugoslavia had the most developed socialist economy in the world. The Rothschild family attempted to demonstrate that the outcomes of socialism are unfavourable, and they succeeded. Without the Rothschilds, there would likely have been no war in Yugoslavia. The war destroyed what the peoples of Yugoslavia had built for generations and jointly owned. The war severed business ties between the republics, causing a decline in the market and a drop in earnings. Consequently, companies lost value and were sold at a discounted rate to partners of the Rothschild family.

But why exactly were the Serbs to blame? When the Rothschild family does evil, they need someone to take the blame for them. What nation could be more suitable for the Rothschild family than the Serbs, who were the only ones to elect socialists in all of Eastern Europe? That’s why they had to get a particular lesson. However, the worst thing for Yugoslavia was that it led to an independent policy. Slobodan Milošević did not allow a rapid and uncontrolled transition to capitalism, nor did he allow social companies to be sold off to the Rothschilds for nothing. This is why Slobodan Milošević had to fall.

World powers under the control of the Rothschilds made life miserable for all the peoples of Yugoslavia. When they finally imposed peace, all nations, except the Serbs, proclaimed them their saviours. All these nations are, in fact, grateful to their criminals, executioners, torturers, and thieves, even though they don’t know it. The most terrifying fact is that today, there is an entirely invisible force that can do evil to an entire country, destroy it, rob it and enslave it without anyone knowing anything about it.

***

This article has a significant shortage of evidence that proves a direct connection between the Rothschild family and the destruction of Yugoslavia. The Rothschild family does not appear in public, does not issue statements, and does not leave visible written traces, making it challenging to unmask them. I think that the Rothschild family can be easily connected to the war in Yugoslavia by conducting an investigation of the former U.S. President, Bill Clinton, for criminal aggression against Yugoslavia in the International Court of Justice in The Hague. However, the U.S. Government does not recognize the Court's jurisdiction over its citizens. Wasn't this Court unjust from the very beginning? Can any American court investigate its former President? Theoretically, it can, but Americans are almost continuously aggressing against other countries, and no president has ever been held responsible for it. This world has no good defence against evil, especially not evil like this. That’s why we live in destructive times.

The other presidents of the states that have committed aggression against Yugoslavia have just followed the media lynch demands, and except for British Prime Minister Tony Blair, they cannot blame Jacob Rothschild. I have presented here that the Western media covered the aggression against Yugoslavia as if it were members of organized crime. The investigations against them could lead to Jacob Rothschild.

However, maybe the easiest way to connect Jacob Rothschild with the aggression against Yugoslavia is by proving that Slobodan Milošević was murdered in the International Criminal Tribunal in The Hague. There is a basis for an investigation against the doctors who have been caring for Slobodan Milošević's heart disease in the court in The Hague. Three months before his death, a medical check-up found traces of the medicine Rifampicin in his blood. It is a drug for leprosy and tuberculosis, which is known as a neutralizer of some effects of the medication Milošević received for his high blood pressure and a heart condition. Milošević was informed about it four days before his death when he stopped taking the medicine.

Finding the unnecessary medicine in Milošević’s blood that reduces the drug’s effect on his heart condition could be characterized as an attempt to murder. The investigation into why the medicine for leprosy and tuberculosis was traced in his blood was never performed. The court released notes indicating that Slobodan Milošević had open access to medicine, allowing him to administer it himself. In other words, he may have done it on purpose to kill himself. The investigation of Slobodan Milošević’s death did not consider that he cried out for help from an independent doctor. The court rejected his request, and it resulted in the infarct from which he died. It is no surprise that the investigators concluded that Milošević died of a heart attack as a natural cause.

However, many doctors stated that the routine operation of coronary angiography and stenting would have certainly prevented his death. This is an elementary medical procedure for heart disease, which would save his life. His doctors have to answer why such a routine intervention of inserting a stent in his heart artery was not performed. For more information, please visit: Death of Slobodan Milošević. The investigation against the Medical Officer of the Detention Unit, Dr. Paulus Falke, can show that somebody must have ordered his death, and that can lead to Jacob Rothschild.

A brief public appearance four years ago at the Rothschild family's home in England could reveal the family’s power. In the following picture, from left to right, are Warren Buffett, currently “the richest” man in the world; California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger; and Lord Jacob Rothschild.

The photograph was likely taken to impress Russian President Vladimir Putin, who was in conflict with Jacob Rothschild at the time over the Russian oil company Yukos. Later, Jacob Rothschild realized that publishing the photos was a significant mistake, as it transformed him from a retiring lover of the arts and flowers into a prominent figure in the world. I think that Jacob Rothschild invested effort in maintaining his status as a modest philanthropist by presenting the meeting as a gathering of philanthropists.

That could easily be the main reason Warren Buffett, currently declared the wealthiest man in the world, decided to give 85% of his wealth, or approximately $50 billion, to the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the majority owner of Microsoft, for humanitarian purposes. This scenario would be possible only if these 50 billion dollars belonged to the Rothschild family. It seems like a very probable scenario. Thus, one could conclude that the Rothschild family provides its beginners with a 15 percent commission. Whether these $ 50 billion would be allocated to humanitarian purposes or it is just a show for the people remains to be seen. Indeed, a mutually beneficial arrangement stands behind it for all parties involved. I believe that behind the grey, refined, apparently good-natured sir in the picture above, enormous power is hidden, such a potential that almost nothing may occur on the world level without his approval.

His son, Nathaniel Rothschild, in the following picture, gets his first experience ruling the world. He attended the proclamation of the Independence of the Republic of Montenegro, on which occasion he congratulated President Milo Đukanović.

Nathaniel Rothschild's presence at that event can be interpreted as the result of his help in attracting significant foreign investment for the construction of Porto Montenegro (one of the models of government corruption). However, Montenegrin television showed him only in the afternoon news, while excluding him from the evening news. This caught my attention because such important ceremonies are not cut short in prime time. I concluded that Montenegrin television tried to cover up his presence. This led me to conclude that Nathaniel Rothschild's presence at the Declaration of Independence of Montenegro was, in fact, a signature at the end of the successfully completed job of breaking up Yugoslavia. Montenegro was the last republic that broke away from the former Yugoslavia.

I’ve discovered the Rothschild family's intentions by watching CNN and the BBC. Of course, I don’t believe in the media’s propaganda, but I still watch them because they show where new crises are likely to appear. How can they not know when they are serving the interests of those who create crises? Crises don’t even “exist” if these media don’t publish them. As a rule, they attack independent countries of the world and then, under the pretext of fighting for justice and democracy, discredit the governments of such countries. The Rothschild family will try to destabilize any country that is not under their influence or control. This is a crime, and it should be called that.

***

If this article seems convincing, please consider recommending it to your friends. The more people are aware of the evil that the Rothschild family and its partners induce, the less they will dare to produce it because, one day, they may be held accountable for what they are doing. This is the purpose of this article. I fight for society as a whole to overcome its fear of the future and lead a good, healthy, and joyful life. This is worth a little risk.

Written on 08.08.08

February 26, 2024. Today, Jacob Rothschild, the secret ruler of the Western world, passed away. From now on, his son, Nathaniel Rothschild, takes his secret position while pretending to be an ordinary citizen.

Recently, it occurred to me that the family may be successfully debunked by targeting seemingly benign conspiracies, such as Chemtrails, Global Warming, or the Flat Earth theory. Flat Earth is one of the most successful conspiracies ever, making people believe they are bright while the Rothschild family controls them by manipulating public information. People who spread seemingly benign conspiracies are more likely to admit they're being paid than those who commit crimes. Investigators need to follow the money that drives the spread of conspiratorial ideas. The Western world is obviously controlled by one center, and according to me, nobody else but the Rothschilds has the power to make it happen.

Aleksandar Šarović 

References:

Yugoslavia: The Avoidable War by George Bogdanich

The Rational Destruction of Yugoslavia by Michael Parenti

James Bissett, the former Canadian Ambassador in Yugoslavia

Emperor’s Clothes Articles on Yugoslavia

Noam Chomsky About Serbia, Kosovo, Yugoslavia and NATO War in 3 parts: